In Simple Words
Think of shoppers buying groceries in a store where nutritional content is hidden in fine print versus a store where color-coded health ratings are stamped clearly on the front of every box. Clear ratings allow busy shoppers to quickly identify and select healthier options without spending hours reading ingredient lists.
Families at unsanctioned Charlotte schools
- Standard materials, no direct scores
- Group used for comparison
- One-page school-score sheet added
- Chose higher-scoring schools
2006–07 choice at unsanctioned schools serving mainly low- and middle-income families. Randomized score sheets; outcome is school chosen, not the child’s own test score.
See source →Study conditions — Hastings and Weinstein ↗Research question
Observed preference heterogeneity in school choice can reflect either inherent differences in parental values or information processing costs and search frictions faced by disadvantaged families. Disentangling these mechanisms is critical because information frictions can be remedied through targeted policy design.
Participants
N = 36,887 human students in Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, North Carolina, evaluated alongside randomized experimental information interventions.
Study Design
Revealed choice demand modeling linked with randomized field experiments distributing simplified, direct school test score graphics to low-income parents.
Results
Standard choice forms produce wide preference heterogeneity across socioeconomic groups. Delivering direct, simplified test score information to low-income families significantly compresses estimated preference heterogeneity, causing low-SES parents to choose high-performing academic schools at rates comparable to high-SES parents.
Takeaway
Distribute simplified, high-salience school performance scorecards directly to low-income households during choice enrollment windows to increase quality elasticity.