In Simple Words
When an educational grant arrives unexpectedly after households have already completed their major annual purchases (e.g., at the start of the school year), families cannot easily return or resell their bought items. This locks in the private spending, causing the full public grant to act as an additive increase in learning resources rather than replacing existing spending.
Pupils in Andhra Pradesh primary schools
- No extra block grant
- Comparison group
- Extra block grant
- Scores rose by 0.085 SD
First year of the trial. SD measures score differences. The authors do not recommend making school funding unpredictable as a lasting policy.
See source →Research question
Standard evaluations assume public funding interventions operate in static environments, but the timing and predictability of grant arrivals dictate whether agents can adjust expenditure behavior before the intervention occurs. When resources arrive unexpectedly, households lack the opportunity to reallocate private funds prior to spending.
Participants
200 primary schools in rural Andhra Pradesh, India (~27,704 student test observations in Year 1).
Study Design
Randomized controlled trial with surprise grant disbursal (~$3 per pupil) announced two months into the school year.
Results
Unanticipated Year 1 grants increased combined student test scores by 0.085 SD (0.09 SD in math, p < 0.05; 0.08 SD in language, p < 0.05) with zero significant reduction in household private spending (-0.041 log expenditure change, p > 0.10).
Takeaway
Deploy emergency or non-recurrent school improvement grants as unexpected one-time allocations to prevent private expenditure reductions during early implementation phases.
Source and citation
See source →Read alongside the research
Plain-English glossary
Original explanations, informed by the references below. Examples are illustrations, not data from the studies above. The research text stays unchanged.
- Randomized controlled trial
A study that uses chance, like drawing lots, to decide who receives each option being compared. Researchers compare the groups’ outcomes to estimate the effect of those options.
ExampleA lottery assigns volunteers to a training programme or a comparison group. Researchers then compare their outcomes.
GET-IT glossary · Randomized study ↗Read more about randomized controlled trial →