In Simple Words
Imagine a family living in an isolated village with no money. If they receive cash from a public works program, they can finally afford bus tickets to move to a big city for better opportunities. But if another family was planning to leave the village solely because there were no jobs, giving them a reliable government job right at home makes them stay.
Households facing migration costs in Comoros
- Study comparison group
- Comparison group
- Public works program
- More resources to fund migration
Reported for groups previously unable to afford migration expenses. This result does not establish that public works always increases migration.
See source →Research question
Extreme poverty can either force individuals to migrate out of distress or prevent them from migrating due to an inability to pay travel and relocation costs. Public works programs alter spatial labor mobility in opposing ways depending on whether local wages relieve travel liquidity constraints or substitute for distress migration.
Participants
Rural households in Comoros and rural participants under India's National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA).
Study Design
Randomized controlled trial tracking migration expenditures in Comoros alongside spatial equilibrium econometric modeling of internal migration patterns in India.
Results
In Comoros, cash earned through workfare enabled marginalized groups to fund previously unaffordable migration costs; in India, NREGA work opportunities available close to home significantly reduced internal labor migration out of rural areas.
Takeaway
Assess local liquidity constraints versus distress migration rates before launching public works programs to predict whether regional labor mobility will increase or decrease.
Source and citation
See source →Read alongside the research
Plain-English glossary
Original explanations, informed by the references below. Examples are illustrations, not data from the studies above. The research text stays unchanged.
- Randomized controlled trial
A study that uses chance, like drawing lots, to decide who receives each option being compared. Researchers compare the groups’ outcomes to estimate the effect of those options.
ExampleA lottery assigns volunteers to a training programme or a comparison group. Researchers then compare their outcomes.
GET-IT glossary · Randomized study ↗Read more about randomized controlled trial →