Between-School Generalizability Limit of Within-School RCTs

Download image · 1200 × 630 PNG

In Simple Words

Evaluating two runners competing on the same track provides a fair comparison of their relative speed, but that match cannot prove how a runner on a smooth track compares to a runner on an uphill mountain trail. Without swapping runners across tracks, cross-site comparisons remain unvalidated.

Research question

Randomized field experiments that restrict student and teacher reassignments to within-school blocks cannot evaluate whether teacher performance measures reliably compare instructor quality across different school sites.

Participants

N = 1,181 randomized teachers in 284 urban public schools across 6 school districts.

Study Design

Blocked randomized controlled trial restricting random roster assignments strictly to exchangeable teacher groups within individual school buildings.

Results

Random assignment was strictly bounded within individual schools, grade levels, and subjects, preventing statistical evaluation of whether teacher value-added metrics hold predictive validity for cross-school teacher transfers or district-wide comparisons.

Takeaway

Limit policy claims regarding teacher value-added validity to within-school comparisons unless inter-school random reassignment data become available.

Source and citation

See source →

Read alongside the research

Plain-English glossary

Original explanations, informed by the references below. Examples are illustrations, not data from the studies above. The research text stays unchanged.

Randomized controlled trial

A study that uses chance, like drawing lots, to decide who receives each option being compared. Researchers compare the groups’ outcomes to estimate the effect of those options.

ExampleA lottery assigns volunteers to a training programme or a comparison group. Researchers then compare their outcomes.

GET-IT glossary · Randomized study ↗Read more about randomized controlled trial →

Related findings