In Simple Words
If a bank lends money for one week at a time, a shopkeeper cannot buy a large delivery truck that takes months to pay off. Shorter-term debt acts like a tight leash that forces the shopkeeper to stick to safe, immediate deals, while longer-term debt gives the freedom to pursue bigger, higher-paying long-term projects.
Research question
Corporate debt theory shows that debt maturity structure directly influences borrower investment risk, where short-term debt can mitigate agency conflicts (such as asset substitution) but also cause severe underinvestment in illiquid, high-return growth projects.
Participants
Theoretical capital structure literature synthesis applied to experimental microcredit data from 845 female entrepreneurs in Kolkata, India.
Study Design
Theoretical comparative analysis contrasting Myers (1977) debt overhang and underinvestment models with Jensen & Meckling (1976) asset substitution theory.
Results
Rigid short-term debt repayment schedules in microfinance act like corporate short-term debt constraints, preventing poor micro-entrepreneurs from making illiquid, high-return investments due to liquidity-driven underinvestment incentives.
Takeaway
Apply corporate capital structure models of debt maturity to microfinance contract engineering to balance agency costs against underinvestment risks.