Macroeconomic Mitigation of Work Disincentives

Download image · 1200 × 630 PNG

In Simple Words

In a high-unemployment job market, workers have fewer opportunities to adjust their working hours or switch jobs even if a voucher reduces their incentive to work. Weak economic conditions act like a constraint that prevents recipients from altering their labor effort immediately, locking in labor choices made during downturns.

Research question

The magnitude of labor supply disincentives caused by social assistance programs may fluctuate depending on broader economic and labor market conditions at the time of program entry.

Participants

N = 42,358 household heads across 405 cohort-by-calendar-quarter observations from 1997 to 2005; Chicago, Illinois.

Study Design

Two-step GLS estimation regressing 405 post-offer Intent-to-Treat (ITT) employment effects on local unemployment rates at the time of voucher offer versus contemporaneous unemployment rates.

Results

A 1 percentage point increase in the unemployment rate surrounding the time of the voucher offer mitigated the ITT employment reduction by 0.006 (relative to an average ITT employment effect of -0.017), indicating weaker economic conditions at offer buffer against labor supply drops.

Takeaway

Evaluate local unemployment rates when measuring social assistance program disincentives, as tight labor markets amplify labor reductions while weak markets constrain them.

Source and citation

See source →

Read alongside the research

Plain-English glossary

Original explanations, informed by the references below. Examples are illustrations, not data from the studies above. The research text stays unchanged.

Percentage points

The difference between two percentages.

ExampleA rise from 40% to 50% is 10 percentage points. Relative to the starting value, that is a 25% increase.

Office for National Statistics · Percentages ↗Read more about percentage points →

Related findings