In Simple Words
Think of an individual's weekly hours as a battery that depletes progressively as work hours increase; trading away the first few hours of leisure costs very little, but trading away leisure time when already working full-time requires a substantially higher financial payout to compensate.
Unemployed US job applicants
- 5 versus 10 hours
- Time valued at $4.80 per hour
- 20 versus 25 hours
- Time valued at $8.95 per hour
Selected assigned job-choice tasks. Estimated mean value of an extra non-work hour, with standard errors $0.96 and $1.74; not realized pay.
See source →Research question
Macroeconomic search models and benefit-cost analyses require direct measurement of how individuals value marginal leisure time across varying work schedules, but empirical estimates of non-work time valuation have historically been difficult to quantify directly.
Participants
N = 1,152 unemployed job applicants (83% female, average age 32.7 years) across 80 U.S. metropolitan areas in the primary field experiment, alongside N = 2,354 choices from 785 respondents in the Understanding America Study.
Study Design
Randomized field experiment offering real work-from-home job applicants discrete choices between two job options differing only in weekly hours and randomized hourly wages, evaluated using a logistic discrete choice model.
Results
Mean hourly MVT rises monotonically from $4.80 for 5–10 hours/week to $8.95 for 20–25 hours/week, $12.00–$14.68 for 30–40 hours/week, and $21.89–$22.69 for 40–50 hours/week, yielding an average flow value of non-work time relative to pre-tax predicted market wage ($\tilde{z}$) of 0.58 ($s.e. = 0.04$).
Takeaway
Estimate the baseline opportunity cost of full-time employment for unemployed jobseekers by multiplying their predicted pre-tax market wage by 0.58.