Product Market Competition and Bad Practice Selection

Download image · 1200 × 630 PNG

In Simple Words

Think of a town with only one grocery store that sells rotten produce at high prices; because no rival store can open, the bad grocery store stays in business forever instead of being forced to improve or close down.

Observed poorly managed firms

United States
Appeared to improve or exit
Developing countries
Poorly managed firms survived

Cross-country survey synthesis; qualitative patterns, not a tested effect of competition or family ownership.

See source →

Research question

Developing economies exhibit a persistent, thick tail of severely mismanaged firms that survive indefinitely. Weak product market competition and high rates of family ownership prevent market reallocations from shutting down inefficient producers.

Participants

Cross-country manufacturing firm dataset spanning 100 to 5,000 employee firms across the US, Europe, Asia, and Latin America.

Study Design

Cross-sectional distribution analysis of firm management quality scores across countries.

Results

Whereas badly managed firms in competitive economies like the US systematically improve or go bankrupt, low product competition and family ownership in developing countries allow badly managed firms to survive, skewing overall average management scores downwards.

Takeaway

Dismantle anti-competitive entry barriers and trade protections to force underperforming firms to adopt modern management practices or exit the market.

Source and citation

See source →

Related findings