Public Cost-Benefit Valuation of Policy Regimes

Download image · 1200 × 630 PNG

In Simple Words

Evaluating a company's safety equipment requires weighing the upfront purchase cost against prevented accident expenses and increased worker productivity, calculating the net money saved across the entire organization.

Unemployed workers in two Danish counties

Usual labour-market policy
Group used for comparison
Early intensive support
Estimated net social value EUR 2000 per person

Reported Council 2007 cost-benefit estimate for the 2005–2006 trial versus usual policy. Includes intervention costs, benefit savings adjusted for tax distortion, and production gains; excludes general-equilibrium effects. Valuation period and uncertainty are not reported in this secondary source.

See source →

Research question

Active labor market policy regimes incur heavy administrative costs for caseworkers and training programs, requiring comprehensive public finance accounting beyond simple benefit payout savings.

Participants

N = 4,513 unemployed UI recipients (human, Denmark: Storstrøm and Southern Jutland counties).

Study Design

Cost-benefit calculation incorporating detailed administrative intervention costs, reduced benefit payouts multiplied by tax distortion factors, and increased economic output value.

Results

The intensified activation policy regime generated a net societal economic value of €2,000 per exposed unemployed individual, excluding macro general equilibrium effects.

Takeaway

Perform comprehensive welfare cost-benefit analyses incorporating tax distortion multipliers and productivity output gains when evaluating administrative labor policy changes.

Source and citation

See source →

Related findings