Strategic Misreporting in High-Stakes Peer Evaluation
Ranking report accuracy dropped by 30% to 34% when financial resources and grant allocations were at stake due to nepotism and peer favoritism [11].
Tag
mechanism_design
2 cards
Tag
2 cards
Ranking report accuracy dropped by 30% to 34% when financial resources and grant allocations were at stake due to nepotism and peer favoritism [11].
Small monetary payments for accuracy doubled reporting accuracy under no-stakes conditions and improved reporting accuracy by over 100% under high-stakes conditions at an added cost of only INR 40 (US$0.70) per loan [11, 14].