Tag
peer_evaluation
2 findings
Labour & employmentPeer Cognitive Evaluation AsymmetryHigh-ability workers accurately predicted referral puzzle scores (coefficient = 0.190, p < 0.05), corresponding to an 0.8 standard deviation performance difference, whereas low-ability workers showed no statistically significant predictive accuracy (coefficient = 0.025, p > 0.10).RCTDevelopmentStrategic Misreporting in High-Stakes Peer EvaluationRanking report accuracy dropped by 30% to 34% when financial resources and grant allocations were at stake due to nepotism and peer favoritism.RCT