In Simple Words
Imagine knowing that a heavy tax will start deducting money from earnings in two years. Because work pays more today than it will after the tax takes effect, a worker puts in extra hours now while net pay remains high, saving energy for when net wages drop later.
Chicago adults after the housing lottery
- Control lottery group
- Comparison quarterly employment rate
- Waiting for a voucher offer
- 0.6 percentage points more employed
Post-lottery quarters before an offer, compared with controls in the same calendar quarter. Small statistically significant employment increase; anticipation is a compatible explanation, not a proven mechanism.
See source →Research question
When social benefit programs operate long waiting lists, applicants anticipate future wage reductions from upcoming benefit phase-out taxes, shifting their timing of work effort.
Participants
N = 42,358 low-income, working-age, able-bodied adults applying to the Chicago Housing Authority Corporation wait-list lottery; Chicago, Illinois.
Study Design
Event-study econometric tracking comparing pre-offer quarters of lottery applicants against randomized control group outcomes using state administrative panel data.
Results
Applicants awaiting a voucher offer increased employment by 0.6 percentage points (approximately 1 percent relative to the control mean) during the pre-offer waiting period prior to receiving voucher assistance.
Takeaway
Evaluate pre-benefit waiting periods in social programs to capture temporary intertemporal labor supply increases prior to program enrollment.
Source and citation
See source →Read alongside the research
Plain-English glossary
Original explanations, informed by the references below. Examples are illustrations, not data from the studies above. The research text stays unchanged.
- Percentage points
The difference between two percentages.
ExampleA rise from 40% to 50% is 10 percentage points. Relative to the starting value, that is a 25% increase.
Office for National Statistics · Percentages ↗Read more about percentage points →