Randomization Inference Permutation Testing

Download image · 1200 × 630 PNG

In Simple Words

Think of shuffling a deck of cards thousands of times to see how often a rare winning hand appears purely by random chance. By randomly swapping treatment labels across participants 10,000 times, researchers construct an exact benchmark distribution to verify if the real experimental result was a true effect or a statistical fluke.

Small and medium firms in France

No proactive agency outreach
0.450 permanent hires per firm
Proactive agency outreach
0.046 more permanent hires per firm

Trial outcome for registered jobseekers. Ten thousand within-design permutations gave p = 0.024. This is a robustness check on the hiring result.

See source →

Research question

Standard asymptotic t-tests in randomized field experiments can produce overconfident significance claims when outcome distributions exhibit heavy skewness, clustering, or potential outlier distortion.

Participants

N = 7,438 establishments across 129 local public employment agencies in France.

Study Design

Randomization inference student test using 10,000 permutation runs within assignment strata (Young, 2018) alongside Mann-Whitney ranksum tests.

Results

Permutation testing yielded exact p-values of p = 0.024 for permanent hires of registered jobseekers and p = 0.037 for theoretical workdays created, confirming significant treatment effects independently of asymptotic distributional assumptions.

Takeaway

Validate field experiment statistical significance by running 10,000-iteration randomization permutation tests alongside standard asymptotic t-tests.

Source and citation

See source →

Related findings