In Simple Words
When a worker gets a high-paying temp job, one might expect them to permanently raise the minimum salary they are willing to accept, like a seller raising prices after one big sale. However, if reservation wages remain flexible or unadjusted, the worker quickly accepts subsequent jobs across the market without extending their unemployment period.
Young male job applicants in Malawi
- Without short work experience
- Reference minimum-pay expectation
- With short work experience
- USD124.40 more per month estimated
Eight-month instrumental-variable estimate of stated monthly reservation pay; not statistically significant. The uncertain estimate does not rule out wage-expectation changes.
See source →Research question
Standard job search models predict that obtaining high-paying short-term work experience causes workers to upwardly adjust their reservation wages. This upward revision can prolong unemployment spells if workers refuse lower-paying subsequent job offers.
Participants
N = 221 urban Malawian male job seekers interviewed at the 8-month follow-up survey in Lilongwe, Malawi.
Study Design
Instrumental variables (IV) estimation evaluating the impact of short-term work experience on self-reported monthly reservation wages and active job search duration.
Results
Receiving short-term work experience resulted in a $124.40 increase in monthly reservation wages that was statistically insignificant (p > 0.10), and produced no statistically significant increase in the proportion of time spent actively searching for work (coefficient = 0.089, p > 0.10).
Takeaway
Measure actual job search duration alongside reservation wage surveys to verify whether wage expectations create search frictions following temporary employment interventions.
Source and citation
See source →Read alongside the research
Plain-English glossary
Original explanations, informed by the references below. Examples are illustrations, not data from the studies above. The research text stays unchanged.
- Follow-up
Collecting more information about participants later in a study to see what has happened to them. The term can also mean the length of time researchers keep track of them.
ExampleResearchers interview the same workers three months after a programme ends. That later interview is a follow-up.
GET-IT glossary · Follow-up ↗Read more about follow-up →- Statistically significant
A label used when a result passes a chosen statistical threshold, often p < 0.05. It does not show how large or useful an effect is. A result that is not statistically significant does not prove there is no effect.
ExampleA study reports p = 0.03 against a 0.05 threshold. It passes that test, but the effect could still be too small to matter.
American Statistical Association · Statement on p-values ↗Read more about statistically significant →