Fixed-Fee Referral Inelasticity

Download image · 1200 × 630 PNG

In Simple Words

Think of paying a talent agent a flat fee to bring any singer to an audition versus paying them a bonus only if the singer gets hired. Doubling the flat fee makes the agent happier, but they still bring their neighbor; only a bonus tied to performance forces the agent to look for real talent.

Male referrers in Kolkata

Rs.60 fixed referral fee
Reference referral process
Rs.80 fixed referral fee
No clear referral change
Rs.110 fixed referral fee
No clear referral change

Laboratory study of male referrers. Performance-pay arms omitted; the summary reports no arm-specific quality scores.

See source →

Research question

Increasing flat-rate monetary rewards for job referrals fails to improve candidate quality because fixed fees do not align the referrer's financial interest with candidate productivity. Without output-contingent rewards, higher unconditional payouts yield identical recruitment choices.

Participants

562 original participants and 407 referrals (adult males aged 18 to 60) in Kolkata, India.

Study Design

RCT laboratory experiment comparing three fixed payment tiers (Rs. 60, Rs. 80, Rs. 110) against performance-indexed payment tiers (Rs. 0-20, Rs. 0-50).

Results

Increasing fixed referral fees from Rs. 60 to Rs. 80 or Rs. 110 produced zero statistically significant impact on referral quality, choice of candidate, or task performance.

Takeaway

Reallocate marginal recruitment budget away from increasing flat referral bonuses and toward performance-contingent bonuses tied to referred worker productivity.

Source and citation

See source →

Read alongside the research

Plain-English glossary

Original explanations, informed by the references below. Examples are illustrations, not data from the studies above. The research text stays unchanged.

Randomized controlled trial

A study that uses chance, like drawing lots, to decide who receives each option being compared. Researchers compare the groups’ outcomes to estimate the effect of those options.

ExampleA lottery assigns volunteers to a training programme or a comparison group. Researchers then compare their outcomes.

GET-IT glossary · Randomized study ↗Read more about randomized controlled trial →
Statistically significant

A label used when a result passes a chosen statistical threshold, often p < 0.05. It does not show how large or useful an effect is. A result that is not statistically significant does not prove there is no effect.

ExampleA study reports p = 0.03 against a 0.05 threshold. It passes that test, but the effect could still be too small to matter.

American Statistical Association · Statement on p-values ↗Read more about statistically significant →

Related findings