Income Source Substitution Effect
RCTClinical Trial
Public cash assistance granted to disadvantaged youth triggers offsetting reductions in alternate income streams, including informal labor earnings and financial support from parents or friends. As a result, the net financial benefit realized by the recipient is substantially smaller than the gross monetary value of the government transfer.
Picture this
Imagine a college student receiving a new $200 monthly stipend from a community program. Upon seeing this extra income, the student's parents reduce their monthly allowance by $50, and the student cuts back on weekend odd jobs by another $100. Consequently, despite receiving $200 in gross public aid, the student's total monthly spending money increases by only $50.
What the evidence says
While treated jobseekers received a mean public transfer increase of €87 per month at month 12, this was offset by a €47 per month reduction in alternate income sources (€26 decrease from employment, €10 decrease from parents, and €11 decrease from other non-work transfers). Consequently, net personal income rose by only €40 per month (ITT, p < 0.05) relative to the control mean of €602 per month.
- Who was studied
- N = 3,413 young jobseekers aged 18–22 surveyed at the 12-month midline across 82 Job Youth Centers in France.
- How
- Randomized controlled trial (RCT) measuring total monthly personal income and itemized income breakdown (public transfers, labor earnings, parental support, non-work transfers).
What to do
Incorporate private transfer crowd-out assumptions into public policy cost-benefit models to avoid overestimating the net financial impact of conditional cash transfers on recipients.
From the source
"The increase in JYC income is associated with a decrease of €47 in other income, of which employment income (€26, not significant), parents (€10), and other non-work sources (€11)."
Conditional_Cash_Transfers_on_the_Labor_Market_Evidence_from_Young.pdf