Irrigation-Fertilizer Input Substitution

Download image · 1200 × 630 PNG

In Simple Words

Imagine a gardener who can either install a regular sprinkler system or buy expensive concentrated plant food. Because the sprinkler system guarantees a steady crop yield, the gardener reduces their purchase of high-cost plant food.

Research question

Smallholder farmers substitute irrigation access for chemical fertilizer intensity, using irrigated land to secure baseline crop production while reducing expenditures on expensive inorganic cash inputs.

Participants

N = 2,217 rural smallholder households across 120 Kebeles in Amhara, Ethiopia.

Study Design

Heckman two-step consistent estimator analyzing the decision to purchase inorganic fertilizer (first stage) and the log value of fertilizer purchased (second stage).

Results

Irrigated area increases the probability of purchasing fertilizer (first stage coefficient = +0.655, p < 0.01) but significantly decreases the overall quantity/value of chemical fertilizer applied per household (second stage coefficient = -1.268, p < 0.01).

Takeaway

Account for access to irrigation when designing input supply targets, as irrigated farms require lower per-hectare chemical fertilizer volume than rain-fed farms.

Source and citation

See source →

Related findings