Time-Varying Psychological Application Costs

Download image · 1200 × 630 PNG

In Simple Words

Imagine having a quick five-minute administrative task on a to-do list, like filing an expense form. On days with high stress or competing demands, starting the task feels like climbing a mountain, so it gets delayed. On a calm day, the exact same task takes almost zero effort. Because high-friction days occur frequently, tasks get postponed indefinitely unless an external prompt forces immediate execution.

Applications across changing call assignments

Applications without calls
Comparison applications
Extra applications caused by calls
No clear difference in interview yield

Within-person crossover analysis. Extra-application estimate uncertain; no clear difference. This does not directly measure changing psychological costs.

See source →

Research question

Jobseekers experience fluctuating psychological, cognitive, or attention costs through time, causing them to repeatedly postpone submitting job applications even for high-value vacancies until application deadlines expire.

Participants

N = 9,838 jobseekers (1,116,952 jobseeker-vacancy matches) in Lahore, Pakistan.

Study Design

Randomized crossover design re-assigning control group jobseekers to phone call treatment in specific matching rounds with jobseeker fixed effects, alongside daily application timing analysis.

Results

Within-jobseeker crossover treatment yields statistically indistinguishable returns between marginal and inframarginal applications (p = 0.503 for interview probability, p = 0.480 for value-weighted interviews). Application submission probability decays exponentially from notification date to deadline date.

Takeaway

Structure platform notifications to provide immediate, one-click execution channels timed during moments of low cognitive burden or immediately preceding hard deadlines.

Source and citation

See source →

Related findings