In Simple Words
Trying to lift a family out of poverty by supporting only the parents or only the children is like trying to move a bicycle forward by pedaling only one wheel. A two-generational model powers both wheels simultaneously by providing remedial tutoring and early education for children while offering job skills and benefit access for parents.
At-risk families in four Spanish cities
- Benefit-access support alone
- Group used for comparison
- Benefit support plus parent and child programs
- Higher monthly household income
Twelve-month pilot. Final survey response 74%; education-only and employment-only arms omitted. Full package tested.
See source →Research question
Intergenerational poverty persists when social protection programs treat adult employment barriers and child educational deficits as separate issues rather than addressing family needs holistically.
Participants
3,133 individuals in 792 families with children across 4 Spanish cities (192 educational treatment, 190 employment treatment, 190 combined treatment, 220 comparison).
Study Design
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) over 12 months by Save the Children testing parent job skills training, child educational support (remedial classes, early childhood spaces, parenting skills), combined support, and standard care.
Results
The combined two-generational intervention significantly reduced household material and social deprivation, increased monthly household income, elevated parents' academic expectations for their children, and increased children's standardized test scores in mathematics and language.
Takeaway
Integrate adult job placement and benefit navigation services with child academic tutoring and early childhood education within a single family-focused program.
Source and citation
See source →Read alongside the research
Plain-English glossary
Original explanations, informed by the references below. Examples are illustrations, not data from the studies above. The research text stays unchanged.
- Randomized controlled trial
A study that uses chance, like drawing lots, to decide who receives each option being compared. Researchers compare the groups’ outcomes to estimate the effect of those options.
ExampleA lottery assigns volunteers to a training programme or a comparison group. Researchers then compare their outcomes.
GET-IT glossary · Randomized study ↗Read more about randomized controlled trial →