Weather-Shock Selection Correction

Download image · 1200 × 630 PNG

In Simple Words

Think of evaluating who attends an optional weekend training session. If bad weather makes traveling difficult, only the most dedicated employees show up. Using rainfall as a decision variable allows analysts to mathematically correct for travel reluctance without distorting actual indoor test performance.

Research question

In labor market hiring experiments and field trials, non-random participant attrition—where individuals fail to return with referrals—biases estimates of how financial incentives affect candidate quality.

Participants

N = 561 original labor market participants tracked across 3-day recruitment windows in Kolkata, India.

Study Design

Heckman two-step selection model utilizing the number of rainy days (0 to 3) during the recruitment window as an exclusion restriction instrument.

Results

One additional day of rainfall during the 3-day window reduced participant return probability by 20.7 percentage points (p < 0.01, chi-squared > 12.6), providing a valid instrument that eliminated non-response selection bias without affecting indoor cognitive task scores.

Takeaway

Utilize exogenous environmental friction variables (such as local precipitation) as exclusion restrictions in selection models to adjust for non-random participant attrition.

Source and citation

See source →

Read alongside the research

Plain-English glossary

Original explanations, informed by the references below. Examples are illustrations, not data from the studies above. The research text stays unchanged.

Percentage points

The difference between two percentages.

ExampleA rise from 40% to 50% is 10 percentage points. Relative to the starting value, that is a 25% increase.

Office for National Statistics · Percentages ↗Read more about percentage points →

Related findings