Non-Applicant Selection Bias in Active Labor Market Evaluations

Download image · 1200 × 630 PNG

In Simple Words

Evaluating a program using only people who signed up is like judging the popularity of a movie by surveying people inside the theater, while completely ignoring everyone who looked at the movie poster outside and walked away.

Research question

Standard randomized evaluations of job training programs estimate treatment impacts by comparing accepted applicants with rejected applicants, systematically ignoring eligible non-applicants who were deterred during recruitment.

Participants

N = 1,460 youth in Experiment 1 and N = 768 youth in Experiment 2 in Cairo, Egypt.

Study Design

Randomized field trial analyzing recruitment-stage eligibility and application drop-off before post-application randomization.

Results

Control application rate was 43% in Experiment 1 and job fair attendance was 5.9% in Experiment 2, establishing that recruitment messaging alters who enters the sample pool before program training impact evaluation occurs.

Takeaway

Measure recruitment-stage eligibility and non-applicant drop-off when evaluating active labor market policies rather than restricting randomization to existing applicant pools.

Source and citation

See source →

Related findings