Tag
almp
9 findings
Labour & employmentAuxiliary Program DecouplingTreatment assignments yielded no statistically significant differences in ALMP participation days (group D mean = 0.056–0.080), meeting invitation frequencies (group D mean = 0.011–0.013), or vacancy referrals (group D mean = 0.031–0.054) across 90, 180, and 365 days (all p-values > 0.10).RCTLabour & employmentAsymmetric Cost-Effectiveness in Active Labor Market PoliciesThe application workshop generates a **20% long-run wage gain** at an extremely low unit cost, placing its impact-to-cost ratio near the top of documented global ALMP interventions compared to expensive multi-hundred-dollar training or cash grant schemes.RCTLabour & employmentEmployability-Driven Effect HeterogeneityFor job seekers with low employability (predicted median duration exceeding 6 months), assignment to an early integration agreement (month 1 or 3) increased the 1-year re-employment probability from 45% (month 6 reference group D) to 53% (group A) and 54% (group C) (p < 0.01), representing an 8 percentage point or 18% relative increase; for high-employability job seekers, early integration agreements had no statistically significant effect (82% vs 82–83%).RCTPolicy & public sectorFiscal Return on Active Labor Market PoliciesStandard public counseling cost €120 per client. Public intensive counseling cost €657 per client and reduced government net costs slightly per job seeker (statistically non-significant). Private intensive counseling cost between €900 and €3,947 per client and increased total net government expenses by approximately €1,162 per enrollee without reducing overall unemployment benefit days paid.RCTLabour & employmentPost-Programme Negative ImpactEmpirical estimations revealed non-positive or negative exit hazard coefficients following program completion across multiple program types (e.g. vocational training post-completion coefficient -0.49 for control group members in Storstrøm).RCTLabour & employmentPrivate Sector Wage SubsidiesPrivate sector wage subsidies were utilized for 8%–12% of treatment group members (vs 4%–6% control) and yielded positive post-program exit effects in Storstrøm (completion coefficient 0.97) compared to public sector temporary jobs.RCTLabour & employmentActive Program Lock-In EffectSpecific active labor market programs exhibited zero positive direct impacts during participation, showing statistically significant negative lock-in effects on unemployment exit rates during program weeks and negative post-program effects across training, subsidized job, and education categories.RCTLabour & employmentProgramme Factory Rule-Based ActivationMandatory 80% time participation rules resulted in programmatic inefficiency, leading policy makers to loosen continuous activation mandates in 2003.Observational StudyLabour & employmentSubsidized Employment Pathway AccelerationEarly integration agreements accelerated transitions into wage-subsidized roles and business startup grants (Gründungszuschuss lasting up to 15 months), driving early 180-day exit increases among low-employability job seekers before unsubsidized employment rates converged at 365 days (7.4 percentage point increase in unsubsidized jobs for Group A vs D).RCT